Free Lords - Vicomtes Feudal Barons and Fief Seigneurs
Historically, The Fief de Thomas Blondel has
territory that existed in both of the
large Fiefs of Bessin and Cotentin. As per the 1440 Deed of Fief Blondel, the Fief has
existed in both St. Pierre Du Bois Parish and Torteval parish for well over 700 years. The original owners of
Fief Blondel land and title were called Vicomtes or Viceomes.
In 1270, on the death of Sir Henry Le Canelly,
the great Guernsey fief Fief Au Canelly was divided between his
daughters. Guilemette, the wife of Henry de Saint Martin obtained a considerable part of the island
originating the Fiefs or Lords of Janin Besnard, Jean du Gaillard, Guillot Justice and Fief de
Thomas Blondel.
Citation
The word
viscount
comes from Old
French
visconte
(Modern
French
:
vicomte
), itself from Medieval
Latin
vicecomitem
, accusative
of
vicecomes
, from Late
Latin
vice-
"deputy" + Latin
comes
(originally "companion"; later Roman imperial courtier or trusted
appointee, ultimately count).
[4]
In 1020, Duke Richard II divides Guernsey diagonally from two halves, granting from south-east to Néel,
Viscount of Cotentin and west to Anchetel, Vicomte du Bessin.
In 12th
Century Kingdom of France, the term baronnie or Baron was generally applied to all lords or seigneurs
possessing an important fief, but later in the
13th century the title of Baron meant that the holder held his Fief
directly from the Crown and was thus more important than a count since counts were
typically vassals.
The holder of an allodial (i.e., suzerain-free) barony was thus called a Free Lord, or Freihere
or Baron. The term baron was not used or created until 1387 by Richard II when he created Baron of Kidderminster
and in 1433, the second baron was created "Baron Fanhope".
-
France Held Guernsey
1338-1345 - The islands were invaded by the
French in 1338, who held some territory until 1345.
-
Feudal Charter 1341 - Edward III of England granted a Charter in
July 1341 to Guernsey, Sark and Alderney, and Jersey confirming their customs, fiefs, and laws to
secure allegiance to the English
Crown.
-
1378 Guernsey Charter Liberties and Tax
Treatment - The young King Richard II of England reconfirmed in 1378 the Charter
rights granted by his grandfather, followed in 1394 with a second Charter granting, because of great
loyalty shown to the Crown, exemption for ever, from English tolls, customs and
duties
A
1440 Record of the Fiefdom Deed
of the Fief of Thomas Blondel which the deed is still at University Leeds, shows the
parishes of St Peter of the Wood and Torteval, Guernsey, made by Janet Blondel to Thomas de la Court.
attested by Jean Bonamy and Jacques Guille, jurats. According to the Deed, the Fief Blondel further includes the: Fief Blondel territory in the
parishes of St Pierre du Bois (St. Peter of the Wood) and of Notre Dame de Torteval along with
the Fief de l'Eperon of Torteval, the Bouvée Phlipot Pain, lying in the said parish of St Pierre
duBois, and the Bouvée Torquetil and Bouvée Bourgeon lying in the said parish of Torteval.
1848 - French Nobility and Titles are eliminated while the Noble Fief Seigneur Titles of
Norman Guernsey continue to exist under Ancient British Feudal Norman Laws.
1919 - Nobility eliminated in Germany and Austria. Since
1919 nobility is no longer legally recognized in Germany. Under the Law on the Abolition of Nobility, Austria
eliminated its noble classes in 1919. However in Guernsey, the ancient property titles of Fief Seigneur or Free
Lord of a Fief continued to exist.
A few of
the Ancient Guernsey fiefs are still registered directly with the Crown where a feudal fee of treizième
or conge was paid in Royal Court directly to Her Majesty. A lawyer must be hired to register the fief in French even today.
Fief Blondel Historically had Chefs de Bouvee who were in
charge of managing tenants within the bouvée. Jean Le Huray was a Chef of the Bouvée de Torquetil in the year 1648,
a dependancy of the Fief Thomas Blondel which indicates that Fief Blondel has an ancient history as a Royal
Fief.
France
In 12th-century France the term baron, in a
restricted sense, was applied properly to all lords possessing an important fief, but toward the end of the 13th
century the title had come to mean that its bearer held his fief direct from
the crown and was therefore more important than a count, since many counts
were only mediate vassals. Citation: baron | title |
Britannica The term baron was not used or created until 1387 by
Richard II when he created Baron of Kidderminster and in 1433, the second baron was created "Baron
Fanhope".
We must now turn from what may be called the political side
of feudalism in Guernsey to glance at the tenures of our manors and then at the economical side of feudalism
in the island, the relations existing between the lord of the manor, the owner of the soil, and his
tenants. What first strikes one is the marvellous vitality of the manorial system. Once a manor always
a manor. It matters not whether, as in the case of many of our Guernsey fiefs, that a manor was
escheated to the Crown in the days of King John, or at a much later period, it never loses its identity, is
never merged into one general royal fief, but preserves through all these centuries its own
individuality. It had its own court and administration, and even to this day it is its " douzaine,"
twelve sworn men, tenants of the manor, who draw up the " extente," or survey, of the holdings of the
tenants.
There were two classes of fiefs in Guernsey, (1) those
held by military service, grand serjeantry or little serjeantry, what are styled in France " fiefs hauberts,"
and " fiefs nobles," and (2) those held by yearly rent or its equivalent, such as a pair of spurs,
&c, which may be compared with vavassories.
So the feudal baron ruled his estate as chief among his
principal tenants, who formed his court and administered justice under his representative, the seneschal.
This system is clearly shown in the records of manor courts in England, and by the old " franchises "
of our Guernsey Fief du Comte, the earliest copy of which dates from 1406. Here we find the seneschal,
or president of the Manor Court, and the greffier, or clerk, appointed by the Lord of the Manor. The
eight vavassors, or judges of the court, were the seigneurs of the eight principal frank-fiefs of the
manor, who held their land by suit of court. By the sixteenth century only three of these frank-fiefs
retained hereditary seigneurs, namely those of Du Groignet, Du Pignon, and De Carteret, the two first
held by the Le Marchants, and the latter by a Blondel.
These seigneurs served as vavassors either in person or by
deputy chosen by themselves, subject to the approval of the Seigneur du Comte. The vavassors of the other
five franc- fiefs, De Longues, Des Reveaux, Du Videclin, Des Grantes, and De La Court, were chosen by the
lord of the manor, and presented by him to take oath before the Manor Court. They bore the title of
seigneurs of the franc-fief they represented whilst acting as vavassors.
The next important officer, the prevot or grangier of the
manor, whose duties in some measure corresponded with those of the prevot or sheriff of the Royal Court, was
curiously chosen by the tenants of the thirty-two vellein bouvees of the manor. Two of these bouvees in turn
choosing
https://archive.org/stream/reporttransa619091912guer/reporttransa619091912guer_djvu.txt
Style of
Seigneur
- As per the The Feudal Dues (Guernsey) Law, 1980 Style of Seigneur of a fief etc. Section 4. The foregoing
provisions of this Law shall be without prejudice –
(a) to the right of any person to use, in the case of a male person, the style of Seigneur and, in the case of a
female person, the style of Dame, of a fief,
(b) to the feudal relationship between Her Majesty and any person holding an interest in a private fief on or at
any time after the commencement of this Law, or to the feudal relationship between any person holding an interest
in any fief and any person holding an interest in a dependency of that fief, and
(c) to the right or obligation of any person by virtue of that person holding an interest in any fief which is not
a right to which those provisions apply or any obligation correlative thereto.
www.guernseylegalresources.gg/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=71301&p=0
Freiherr or Free
Lord in the feudal system
The title Freiherr derives from the historical situation in which
an owner held free (allodial) title to his land, as opposed
"unmittelbar" ("unintermediated"), or held without any intermediate feudal tenure; or unlike the ordinary
baron, who was originally a knight (Ritter) in vassalage to a higher lord or sovereign, and unlike
medieval German
ministerials, who were bound to provide administrative services for a
lord. A Freiherr sometimes exercised hereditary administrative
and judicial prerogatives over those resident in his barony instead of the liege
lord, who might be the duke (Herzog) or count (Graf).
Some of the older baronial families began to use
Reichsfreiherr
in formal contexts to distinguish themselves from the new classes of barons created by monarchs of lesser stature
than the Holy Roman Emperors, and this usage is far from obsolete. Reichsfreiherr
is a Germanic title of nobility, usually translated as Baron of the Empire and implies an ancient property title
direct from the crown.
From the Middle Ages onward, each head of a Swedish noble
house was entitled to vote in
any provincial council when held, as in the Realm's Herredag, later Riddarhuset. In
1561, King Eric
XIV began to grant some
noblemen the titles of count (greve) or baron (friherre). The family members of a friherre were entitled to the same title, which in time
became Baron or Baronessa colloquially: thus a person who formally is a friherre now might use the title of "Baron" before his
name, and he might also be spoken of as "a baron".
However, after the change of constitution in 1809, newly created baronships in
principle conferred the dignity only in primogeniture.[11] In the now valid Swedish Instrument of
Government (1974), the possibility to create nobility is completely
eliminated; and since the beginning of the twenty-first century, noble dignities have passed from the official
sphere to the private.
In Denmark and Norway, the title of Friherre was of equal rank to that of
Baron,[citation needed] which has gradually replaced it. It was instituted on 25 May 1671 with Christian
V's Friherre privileges. Today only a few Danish noble
families use the title of Friherre and most of those are based in Sweden, where
that version of the title is still more commonly used; a Danish Friherre generally is addressed as "Baron".[12] The wife of a Danish or Norwegian Friherre is titled Friherreinde, and the daughters are
formally addressed as Baronesse.[10] With the first free Constitution of
Denmark of 1849 came a
complete abolition of the privileges of the nobility. Today titles are only of ceremonial interest in the
circles around the Monarchy of
Denmark[13]
Tenants In Chief
Tenant-in-chief is a modern coinage which, 'like many other supposedly technical terms of
feudalism,
seems to be a creation of medievalists rather than of the middle ages' (Reynolds, Fiefs, page 324).
By convention, tenants-in-chief are those landowners who held their lands directly from the Crown
after the Conquest. In Domesday Book they are individually listed at the beginning of each county, where
they are each assigned a separate section, or chapter, conventionally known as their fief. The totality
of their county fiefs are conventionally called Honours.
Whether, at this stage, tenancies-in-chief owed defined quotas of military service to the Crown is unclear;
Domesday Book is unforthcoming on the subject.
The minor landowners who held directly from the Crown were normally grouped together in a collective
fief at the end of the text for each county, though Domesday Book is not entirely consistent in its
classification of major and minor tenants-in-chief. At a later date most of these lesser tenants-in-chief would
be known as sergeants.
On fiefs and feudalism, see Susan Reynolds, Fiefs and vassals: the
medieval evidence reinterpreted (1994); and on military quotas, see J.H. Round, Feudal England (1895); and John Gillingham, 'The introduction of knight
service into England', Anglo-Norman Studies, vol. 4 (1982), pages 53-64;
181-87.
See also baron,
codes
for landowners, subinfeudation,
and tenure.
|